Organisational Behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 7

Organisational Behaviour - search ExampleAccording to Needham (p. 222), hierarchy refers to the structure of scheme management where there is direct communication link up between superior and subordinates. In this kind if structure each member has a neat soul of the chain of command and to whom he or she is responsible to. It is from the top of the company, the managing director down to the workforce below. An organization ought to operate within a structure that is appropriate with its purposes for it to fulfill its mission trenchantly. Large organizations are unremarkably divided into functional areas. In the case of syngenta, its functions includes research and development, global supply which also include manufacturing, homosexual resources, sales and marketing, finance and information systems. The companys structure is identical to most companies, it has likelihood of having several(prenominal) layers of authority. The number of levels is determined by structure that the organization has. It can be a flat or hierarchical structure. A hierarchical structure is composed of several levels of management, each having span of control which is narrow. In this kind of structure, instructions are directed from level of management on the top to the workforce below. Feedback comes crime versa from the workers below to the supervisors on the top. In the hierarchical structure there is chain of control, this is the reporting system from those on the top of the hierarchy to those below. In this kind of structure, there is strict supervision. In addition, this kind of structure has clear promotion opportunities. This clarity reduces the levels of stress among the managers and employees. In this kind structure, everyone knows their roles to play. However, hierarchical organisations face communication challenges, hence, pretermit of effective management delays the passing of information in the chain of command. Another setback here is that employees may lack full empowerment. This does not allow them to b e innovative.